![]() ![]() ![]() Here we find a way of articulating constraint as a core principle of evolution and of the even more general emergence of complex order, or as one of Delany’s characters puts it: “there are some directions in which you cannot go. As some of us are also driven to know - and as poets know and those versed in dynamical theory know: constitutive constraints are pure positivities for the systems driven by them. ![]() On the one hand, this statement might make you feel sorry for Freud: was he really such a control freak that he could get no inexplicable pleasures? On the other hand, you might feel inclined to disbelieve him: if he is first moved by something and proceeds to get pleasure only if he can figure out why, are we supposed to believe that being moved by it was not pleasurable in the first place? Here we come up against the reductiveness of the Freudian arc of arousal and release, which tends to disavow all the pleasure except what’s found at the very end.īut finally - and this is what brings us to Delany - we can at least affirm with Freud that the pleasure of what moves us specifically - of what I think must be called erotic particularity - can be resonantly linked with the pleasure of metacognition.Īs even Freud may not have disavowed, some kernel of the erotic particularities that drive us must remain opaque, and this opacity might on the one hand be characterized as the grain of sand around which the pearls of our selves and lives and metacognitions are secreted, or on the other as that which in practice we do well to treat simply as fact. ![]() Some rationalistic, or perhaps analytic, turn of mind in me rebels against being moved by a thing without knowing why I am thus affected and what it is that affects me. Whenever I cannot do this, as for instance with music, I am almost incapable of obtaining any pleasure. to explain to myself what their effect is due to. This has occasioned me, when I have been contemplating such things, to spend a long time before them trying to apprehend them in my own way, i.e. This time, it made me think of Freud’s famous essay “The Moses of Michaelangelo.” Freud acknowledges upfront that “works of art exercise a powerful effect on me” and that No doubt this “Mandate To Explain” was installed in my brain during my training as a literary critic. When I began thinking about how best to honor Samuel Delany today, I felt some sense of obligation to explain what for me has been the transformative effect of reading Delany’s work, especially from the standpoint of queer studies. Trigger warning: this essay includes snippets of cultural theory, so if you’ve had traumatic experiences with it, please be careful. Samuel Delaney interviewed at ReaderCon 2011 (watch video here). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |